Welcome Guest Login | Register | Site Map | | Make TelecomTiger my homepage     
Telecom News
Enterprise |  Policy & Regulation |  Mobiles & Tabs |  Corporate |  VAS |  People Movement  |  Technology  |  LTE
Policy & Regulation
TDSAT asks Airtel to pay 25% of Rs 50 cr penalty
TT Correspondent |  |  22 Oct 2011

The Telecom Disputes Settlement and Appellate Tribunal (TDSAT) on Friday directed Bharti Airtel to deposit 25% of Rs 50 crore fine imposed by DoT for camouflaging the calling-line identification (CLI) and said that "prima facie" the company has violated the licence conditions.

"We, therefore, are of the opinion that prima-facie the petitioner [Bharti Airtel] has violated the conditions of licence," said the TDSAT in its interim order.

The sectoral tribunal further noted that Bharti Airtel should not have handed over the incorrect call data records and given misinformation to the Telecom Enforcement Resources & Monitoring Cell (TERM).

"Keeping in view the fact that an allegation of violation of conditions of licence of such nature had been made, the petitioner not only should have handed over the correct CDR but should not also have given wrong information to the respondent that the Mediation Server is located at Noida," the tribunal said.

Moreover, it said when TERM had called a meeting with Bharti Airtel, the company officers did not attend it. They did not even give an advance intimation about their non- participation in the meeting, the tribunal added.
"It was necessary keeping in view the request made by the respondent to attend the said meeting with the petitioner''s COO/ CEO and technical team," TDSAT said.

The Department of Telecommunications (DoT) had slapped a penalty of Rs 50 crore on Bharti Airtel for allegedly camouflaging its CLI mechanism in Madhya Pradesh circle for making business promotion calls to non-Airtel mobile customers. The company had challenged the fine in the tribunal.

The TDSAT also rejected the claims of the Bharti Airtel that it was not given a chance to present its views and no show cause notice was issued by DoT.
"The petitioner, as would appear from the TERM letter dated January 21, 2011 and the consequent cause shown by the petitioner by its letter dated Janury 27, 2011, was also granted an opportunity of being heard and making a presentation," observed TDSAT.

"We are furthermore of the opinion that the Airtel has been given an opportunity to explain its case," it further observed.

The tribunal, however, also said DoT also failed to justify why a maximum penalty of Rs 50 crore was imposed on the telecom operator for making business promotion calls to non-Airtel mobile customers.

"There is nothing on record to show as to why the maximum amount of penalty of Rs 50 crore has been imposed, and furthermore having regard to the nature of defence raised by the petitioners that the violation occurred owing to a technical error, are of the opinion that interest of justice would be sub-served, if the petitioner is directed to deposit 25% of the said amount, namely, a sum of Rs 12.50 crore," the tribunal said.

    
 mail this article    print this article    Show and Post comment
22 Oct 2011(IST)  
Whitepaper
Maintain Business Continuity with Cisco ASR 9000 nV Technology
It is a virtual chassis solution where a pair of ASR 9000 routers acts as a single device by maintaining a single contr...read more
Simplify Your Network with Cisco ASR 9000 nV Technology
With the new Cisco Network Virtualization (nV) technology in the Cisco ASR 9000 Series Aggregation Services Routers, se...read more
Cisco Small Cell Solution: Reduce Costs, Improve Coverage
It is designed to address the challenge of mobile service coverage and to expand network capacity...read more